News Admin

Article #91

The Horn and the Gulf: How a New Geopolitical Confluence is Emerging

Metadata

Source type
rss
Canonical URL
https://africanarguments.org/2026/01/the-horn-and-the-gulf-how-a-new-geopolitical-confluence-is-emerging/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-horn-and-the-gulf-how-a-new-geopolitical-confluence-is-emerging
Workflow
draft
Approval
draft
Publish
not_ready
Published
21 Jan 2026, 13:38 UTC
Content hash
86c59f7c1bd33
Quality
100.00

Content

Summary

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland continues to reverberate across the Red Sea’s fast-changing geopolitics. How to read the emerging regional map? Certainly not through the lens of colonial cartographies. The Horn of Africa continues to grapple with the consequences of Israel’s recognition of Somaliland on December 26, 2025 – a region Somalia maintains is part of its sovereign territory. But this recent Israeli pivot towards Somaliland follows a period of heightened regional tension that had escalated in early 2024 following Ethiopia’s reported intention to grant Somaliland diplomatic recognition in exchange for a naval base on the Gulf of Aden. That incident […] The post The Horn and the Gulf: How a New Geopolitical Confluence is Emerging appeared first on African Arguments.

Full Text

Map of the Gulf and the Horn of Africa Israel’s recognition of Somaliland continues to reverberate across the Red Sea’s fast-changing geopolitics. How to read the emerging regional map? Certainly not through the lens of colonial cartographies. The Horn of Africa continues to grapple with the consequences of Israel’s recognition of Somaliland on December 26, 2025 – a region Somalia maintains is part of its sovereign territory. But this recent Israeli pivot towards Somaliland follows a period of heightened regional tension that had escalated in early 2024 following Ethiopia’s reported intention to grant Somaliland diplomatic recognition in exchange for a naval base on the Gulf of Aden. That incident triggered a tide of Somali nationalism, leading Mogadishu to rally regional allies against Ethiopia and demand the withdrawal of Ethiopian troops from Somalia – much like Mogadishu has now rejected Tel Aviv’s recognition of Hargeisa, and consequently expelled the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from Mogadishu. Tensions in the region escalated when Egypt, currently in a dispute with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, entered a security pact with Eritrea and Somalia. As part of this alliance, Egypt pledged military personnel and arms to Somalia. In response, Ethiopia increased its military presence along the Ogaden border with Somalia, and encouraged insurgencies inside both Eritrea and Djibouti. In April 2025, during a visit to Djibouti, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi reiterated that only littoral states should govern the Red Sea, a stance that effectively excludes Ethiopia. Simultaneously, Ethiopia’s ambitions for sea access shifted toward the Eritrean port of Assab after a Turkish-brokered rapprochement between Ethiopia and Somalia in late 2024 led Ethiopia to withdraw its deal with Somaliland. This has further strained relations with Asmara, despite their period of cooperation during the 2020–22 Ethiopian civil war. For Ethiopia, the loss of access to the Red Sea has elicited a sense of nationalistic nostalgia for the period when Eritrea was part of the country, specifically regarding ownership of the ports of Assab and Massawa. For Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Ali, who is currently facing numerous insurrections, the issue of sea access serves as a catalyst for jingoism to redirect nationalist passions. In contrast, Israel’s entry into the Horn of Africa’s geopolitical theatre has far more recent origins, and is motivated by events that followed the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on its soil. This crisis led the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen to launch missiles targeting Israel and disrupt international shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Israel’s involvement also reflects the significant rupture between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, that now promises to recalibrate alliances across regional capitals throughout the wider Horn of Africa. Integrating the Horn and the Gulf The Horn of Africa is now being integrated into the security systems of the Indo-Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the wider Middle East. Indeed, the geopolitical competition for control along the Red Sea – around which the devastating wars in Yemen and then Sudan were forged – intensified significantly following the events in Israel of October 7. The subsequent expansion of the Israel-Hamas conflict, which came to involve the Houthis in western Yemen, threatened to further destabilize not only the Middle East and the Gulf, but also the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden along the Horn of Africa coastline. This instability posed a severe threat to international merchant shipping and global oil transit. Given that over 10 percent of global trade passes through the Bab-al-Mandab and the Suez Canal annually, these developments have come to underscore the critical geostrategic integration of the Horn of Africa and the Gulf region. While analysts and foreign missions often view the Horn of Africa and the Gulf as separate portfolios, these two regions are increasingly forming a new geopolitical confluence. Separated by as little as 60 kilometres across the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, the colonial, cultural, religious, and kinship ties between the former Ottoman Empire and the Horn of Africa remain significant. These connections should not be overlooked or obscured by modern readings of the Muslim world that prioritize European colonial cartography. Today, consequential networks of influence are being built across the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, shaping new power configurations. And while this integration is driven primarily by intensifying competition for influence over the Red Sea’s trade and transit routes, it is also being shaped by competing political visions for the future of the Muslim world, specifically between various forms of Islamism and their detractors. This state of affairs could be traced to the geopolitical shifts following the 2011 Arab Spring, which saw traditional Middle Eastern powers such as Syria, Libya, Egypt, and Iraq eclipsed by the rise of Gulf states as the primary regional powerhouses. And they have not only been courted by traditional global powers (the USA, China, Europe and Russia) for their loyalty; they have been negotiating increasingly central roles as collaborators and strategic partners. Consequently, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE came to assume prominent roles in the mediation of the Israel-Hamas conflict, though their differing agendas contributed to an unstable ceasefire. In fact, significant diplomatic divisions had persisted among these states, especially following the 2017 Saudi-Emirati-led blockade of Qatar. The UAE, for example, has remained the only one of the three Gulf states to have signed the 2020 Donald Trump sponsored ‘Abraham Accords’ that seek normalization of relations between Arab-Muslim states and Israel. Furthermore, varying levels of commitment to countering Islamist causes and differing diplomatic stances toward Iran – the leader of the ‘ Axis of Resistance ’ involving Hezbollah, the Houthi Movement, and Hamas – shaped mutual suspicions. These rifts underscore the fragility of the diplomatic framework surrounding the crisis in Gaza, as seen in the Israeli attack on Hamas negotiators in Doha on September 9, 2025. Shortly after this incident, Saudi Arabia signed a defence pact with Pakistan – a nuclear power and a growing defence-industrial player in the Muslim world – offering protections similar to those of the NATO alliance. Unconfirmed reports suggest that Turkiye and Egypt, but also Malaysia, Somalia, Indonesia, and Azerbaijan are considering joining this security arrangement. Analysts refer to the potential multilateral defence alliance as the new ‘ Muslim-NATO’ . Recognizing Somaliland and its implications for the Horn The outcome is that Israel has formed a security alliance with the UAE, and has gravitated toward the Emirati-led, but fragile ‘Axis of secessionists’ . This refers to the UAE’s geopolitical strategy of supporting non-state and separatist actors across the Middle East, the Southern Arabian periphery, and the Horn of Africa. While this approach provides the UAE with strategic depth, it frequently places Abu Dhabi in opposition to central governments and regional rivals such as Saudi Arabia and Iran. Notably, prior to recognizing Somaliland, Israel had signalled acceptance of the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) in Yemen. This relationship initially emboldened the STC to pursue an expansionist agenda, seizing oil-rich areas in Hadhramaut and al-Mahra near the Saudi border, which caused significant concern in Riyadh. Although Riyadh has since moved to reclaim these areas and the STC has been dissolved following the withdrawal of UAE security personnel, the resulting rift between the UAE and Saudi Arabia remains profound. The Saudi Arabia and UAE rupture in Yemen not only parallels the civil war in Sudan, when both countries elected to support opposing sides of the ongoing civil war; their face-off is now sending ripples throughout the Horn of Africa. It is notable that the Egyptian-led ‘Tripartite Alliance’ against Ethiopia’s ambitions for sea access originally included countries that have since aligned with states traditionally opposed to Israel. These include Iran, which is known to have developed relations with Asmara; Turkiye and Qatar, both of which remain strong allies of Mogadishu; and Saudi Arabia, which, together with Egypt, supports the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) in Khartoum. The SAF itself enjoys positive relations with Somalia, Eritrea and Egypt, i.e., the three signatories of the 2024 alliance of littoral states against Ethiopia. While the UAE (which allies itself with Addis Ababa) has closed ranks with Israel in their support of Somaliland, Abu Dhabi continues its support of other separatist causes in the region, from Puntland to Jubaland in Somalia, the Libyan National Army in Eastern Libya, to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Nowhere were these recalibrations of regional alliances in the Horn clearer than during the recent inauguration of Somalia’s newest federal member state, North Eastern State (NES) under Abdikhadir Ahmed Aw-Ali Firdhiye in Laas Aanood. The 16 January event inside a little-known location of Northern Somalia’s arid terrain was attended not only by Somalia’s President, Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud but also ambassadors from Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, China, Sudan, Djibouti and the Sudan Armed Forces, a loose alliance of countries that are opposed to Israel’s recognition of Somaliland on one level, and are against any possibilities of an Israeli military outpost along the Gulf of Aden on another. The possibility of a proxy, or live conflict along the Gulf of Aden has never been more imminent. Days after Israel’s recognition of Somaliland – believed to have included amongst other agreements, the establishment of an Israeli outpost at the Somaliland port of Berbera – another agreement was hammered out between Mogadishu and Ankara for the establishment of a Turkish military base at Laas Qoray , a territory on the Somaliland coast outside Hargeisa’s control. Berbera and Laas Qoray lie only 357 kilometres apart. These recent developments depict the geopolitical competition for influence and resources that has been taking shape along the Horn of Africa over the last decade, encompassing significant deposits of hydrocarbons, minerals, agricultural land, and strategic access to vital waterways and ports. Beyond material factors, it is important not to overlook the deeper ideological contest regarding competing visions for the future of the Muslim world. Put differently, this is also a contest between Islamist visions – represented principally by Iran, but also Qatar and groups like the SAF – and their detractors, most notably the emerging alliance between Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi. In sum, the emergence of middle powers on the global stage, particularly Gulf states, in the context of increasing global multipolarity, has become the major destabilizing factor in the Horn of Africa, leaving it in a state of flux and transition. More than ever before, these contestations, as they straddle the Horn and the Gulf, are bringing to life a new geopolitical confluence, with major consequences for the immediate future of the region and beyond. The post The Horn and the Gulf: How a New Geopolitical Confluence is Emerging appeared first on African Arguments .

AI Variants

news_brief

gpt-5.4

Red Sea tensions redraw alliances between the Horn of Africa and the Gulf

Short summary: Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has intensified rivalry across the Horn of Africa and the Gulf, accelerating a broader regional realignment tied to Red Sea security, shipping routes and competing political blocs.

Long summary: A new geopolitical alignment is taking shape across the Horn of Africa and the Gulf as Israel’s recognition of Somaliland sharpens existing disputes over sovereignty, sea access and regional influence. Somalia has rejected the move and expelled the UAE from Mogadishu, while Ethiopia, Egypt, Eritrea, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE are all recalibrating positions around Red Sea security and Gulf of Aden access. The article argues that the Horn and the Gulf can no longer be viewed separately, as trade chokepoints, military basing, proxy rivalries and ideological competition are increasingly binding the two regions together.

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland on December 26, 2025 has added fresh strain to an already volatile regional landscape linking the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. Somalia, which considers Somaliland part of its sovereign territory, rejected the move and expelled the UAE from Mogadishu.

The development follows earlier tensions sparked by Ethiopia’s reported 2024 plan to recognize Somaliland in exchange for naval access, a move that triggered a Somali backlash and regional diplomatic mobilization. Egypt later deepened its involvement through a security pact with Eritrea and Somalia, while Ethiopia increased military pressure along its frontier and pursued alternative routes to the sea.

The broader significance lies in the growing integration of the Horn and Gulf arenas. Conflict spillover from Gaza, Houthi attacks in the Red Sea and threats to global shipping have elevated the strategic importance of Bab al-Mandab and the Gulf of Aden, through which more than a tenth of world trade passes.

The article says rival blocs are now forming around ports, military access and political influence. Israel and the UAE are portrayed as aligning behind Somaliland, while Somalia has drawn support from states including Turkiye and others opposed to any Israeli military foothold on the Gulf of Aden.

Recent reports of a possible Israeli presence at Berbera and a separate Somalia-Turkiye deal for a Turkish military base at Laas Qoray underscore the risk of direct or proxy confrontation. The result is a fast-evolving geopolitical confluence with consequences stretching beyond the Red Sea.

Tags: Horn of Africa, Red Sea, Somaliland, Somalia, Gulf geopolitics, Israel, UAE, Ethiopia, Egypt, Turkiye

Hashtags: #HornOfAfrica, #RedSea, #Somaliland, #Somalia, #GulfOfAden, #Geopolitics

social

gpt-5.4

Why the Horn of Africa and the Gulf are becoming one strategic arena

Short summary: Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has become a flashpoint in a much bigger contest over Red Sea shipping, Gulf of Aden ports, military bases and rival regional blocs.

Long summary: The article argues that events in Somaliland, Somalia, Ethiopia, Egypt, the Gulf and the wider Middle East are converging into one geopolitical struggle centered on the Red Sea. Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, Somalia’s backlash, Ethiopia’s search for sea access, Egypt’s security alignment with Eritrea and Somalia, and reported military base plans near Berbera and Laas Qoray all point to a more dangerous and interconnected regional order.

A major regional realignment is unfolding around the Red Sea.

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has raised the stakes in the Horn of Africa, where Somalia rejects Somaliland’s independence and has responded forcefully. But the issue goes far beyond one diplomatic decision.

The bigger story is that the Horn of Africa and the Gulf are increasingly merging into a single strategic space shaped by:
- Red Sea and Gulf of Aden shipping routes
- Port access and naval ambitions
- Rival Gulf alliances
- Spillover from the Gaza war and Houthi attacks
- Competition over military bases and influence

The article links Israel, the UAE, Somalia, Ethiopia, Egypt, Eritrea, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iran to a fast-changing regional map.

Among the most consequential claims: possible Israeli plans linked to Berbera and a separate Somalia-Turkiye agreement for a Turkish military base at Laas Qoray, placing rival security footprints along the same coastline.

The warning is clear: the risk of proxy conflict, or even direct confrontation, along the Gulf of Aden is rising as the Horn and the Gulf become more tightly connected.

Tags: social explainer, Horn of Africa, Red Sea crisis, Somaliland recognition, Somalia politics, regional security, military bases, global trade

Hashtags: #HornOfAfrica, #GulfOfAden, #RedSea, #Somaliland, #Somalia, #GlobalTrade, #Geopolitics

web

gpt-5.4

How Israel’s Somaliland move is accelerating a Horn-Gulf geopolitical realignment

Short summary: Recognition of Somaliland has become the latest trigger in a wider struggle over Red Sea trade routes, military positioning, regional alliances and rival political visions stretching from the Horn of Africa to the Gulf.

Long summary: The article examines how Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has intensified an already complex competition linking the Horn of Africa with the Gulf and the wider Middle East. It traces how Ethiopia’s pursuit of sea access, Somalia’s response, Egypt’s pact with Eritrea and Somalia, and the fallout from the Gaza war and Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping have all contributed to a new regional convergence. The central argument is that the Horn and the Gulf are now part of a single strategic theatre shaped by ports, military bases, proxy conflicts, trade chokepoints and ideological contestation.

A new geopolitical confluence is emerging across the Horn of Africa and the Gulf, driven by intensifying competition over ports, sea lanes, military access and regional influence.

At the center of the latest shift is Israel’s December 26, 2025 recognition of Somaliland, a territory Somalia regards as part of its sovereign land. Mogadishu has rejected the decision and, according to the article, expelled the UAE from the Somali capital. The move has reignited tensions that were already heightened by Ethiopia’s reported 2024 plan to recognize Somaliland in exchange for a naval base on the Gulf of Aden.

That earlier proposal triggered a wave of Somali nationalism and pushed Somalia to rally regional support against Ethiopia. Egypt, already locked in a dispute with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, then entered a security pact with Eritrea and Somalia, promising military personnel and arms to Mogadishu. Ethiopia in turn expanded its military posture along the Ogaden border and shifted its search for sea access toward Eritrea’s port of Assab after a Turkish-brokered rapprochement with Somalia led it to step back from the Somaliland deal.

The analysis argues that these maneuvers cannot be understood in isolation from wider Red Sea turmoil. After the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and the subsequent spread of conflict involving the Houthis in Yemen, the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden became even more central to global security and trade. With more than 10 percent of global trade passing through Bab al-Mandab and the Suez Canal each year, instability along the Horn’s coastline now carries worldwide economic implications.

A key theme is that the Horn of Africa and the Gulf are no longer separate policy arenas. Instead, they are increasingly bound together by trade corridors, military arrangements, cross-Red Sea rivalries and long-standing cultural and political ties. Gulf powers such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar have become major regional actors, while Turkiye, Egypt, Iran and Israel are also shaping the balance.

The article describes a fractured regional map. Israel is presented as aligning with the UAE in support of Somaliland, fitting into what the author characterizes as an Emirati pattern of backing separatist or non-state actors across the region. On the other side, Somalia has strengthened ties with countries such as Turkiye and with states wary of any Israeli military foothold on the Gulf of Aden.

Recent developments illustrate how quickly the landscape is changing. Days after Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, which the article says is believed to have included plans for an Israeli outpost at Berbera, Mogadishu and Ankara reportedly reached an agreement for a Turkish military base at Laas Qoray, another coastal location in northern Somalia outside Hargeisa’s control. With the two sites only 357 kilometers apart, the possibility of proxy escalation or direct confrontation appears to be growing.

Beyond military positioning, the article argues that ideological competition is also shaping the region, especially disputes over Islamism, anti-Islamist politics and the future political order in the Muslim world. In that reading, the Horn-Gulf arena is becoming a frontline not only for strategic resources and shipping routes, but also for competing political projects.

The overall conclusion is that rising middle powers, especially Gulf states, are helping drive instability and rapid realignment in the Horn of Africa. As global politics becomes more multipolar, the Red Sea corridor is emerging as a single, interconnected theatre with consequences for Africa, the Middle East and international trade.

Tags: analysis, Horn of Africa, Gulf region, Red Sea, Somaliland, Somalia, Israel, UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, Turkiye, maritime security

Hashtags: #RedSea, #HornOfAfrica, #Gulf, #Somaliland, #Geopolitics, #MaritimeSecurity

Media

No media attached.

Audit Log

No audit events recorded.