News Admin

Article #117

Women politicians face tech-facilitated violence in Uganda’s 2026 elections

Metadata

Source type
rss
Canonical URL
https://globalvoices.org/2026/02/16/women-politicians-face-tech-facilitated-violence-in-ugandas-2026-elections/
Workflow
draft
Approval
draft
Publish
not_ready
Published
16 Feb 2026, 06:00 UTC
Content hash
1a9a9e6509847f
Quality
100.00

Content

Summary

Ideally, the law that is supposed to protect women online is the Computer Misuse Act 2011, but it has instead been used to attack feminist dissenters.

Full Text

AI-generated images, gendered disinformation, and harmful narratives were used to target Ugandan women politicians Originally published on Global Voices Left: Winnie Byanyima. Image by COP PARIS , CC0 1.0 . Middle: Joyce Mpanga. Image by U.S. Mission Uganda. CC0 1.0 . Right: Stella Nyanzi. Image by Kritzolina , CC BY-SA 4.0 . All via Wikimedia Commons . Since gaining independence from the UK in October 1962, Ugandan women have played a critical role in shaping politics and governance throughout the country. From Joyce Mpanga , who served as Minister of Women in Development from 1988 to 1989, to Winnie Byanyima , who played a critical role in framing the 1995 Ugandan Constitution , women have shaped the political and governance landscape in Uganda, paving the way for countless young girls and women. The 1995 Constitution introduced affirmative action. Article 21 of the Ugandan Constitution reserves one-third of local government seats and parliamentary positions for women, ensuring their active participation in the country’s decision-making processes. In January 2026, Uganda held its general elections, and several women ran as candidates. However, women campaigners have to worry about more than giving speeches and rallying voters — they also have to navigate online violence that manifested as deepfakes, AI-generated images, gendered disinformation, and harmful narratives that were weaponised to target Ugandan women politicians during this year’s election. Recent attacks on Ugandan women in politics Nawaya Gloria, a human rights lawyer, Global HIV advocate, and an aspiring youth Member of Parliament (MP) for the Central region in Uganda, found herself in an online battlefield of misogynistic attacks. She tweeted about her intention to contest for the Youth MP seat: I am going to be the first HIV-positive living young person to represent Youth Voices in Parliament. Nawaya says that she was born with HIV through mother-to-child transmission and that when she was growing up, she was hopeless, but later used her story to champion the rights of persons living with HIV. This tweet, meant to inspire, was instead met with harsh comments and attacks from even “respected” people in Ugandan social circles. A former Vice Chancellor of Makerere University , the first and largest University in Uganda, quoted the tweet and said: Knowing that we shall have so many horny MPs in parliament, I pray for you not to go through. https://t.co/GpGE6uvoSr — Prof. V Baryamureeba (@baryamureeba) November 12, 2025 This was promoting the narrative that young women seek parliamentary positions just to have sex with male members of parliament. Nawaya responded with a picture of herself saying, “I am sending a smile to Professor Vernacious Baramureeba , and I want to let you know that I am not going to parliament to sleep around but rather to create change…” In response, he doubled down on his attacks. “Nobody is stigmatizing you. All we are saying is stop using your HIV status as a vote card. Youth should vote for you on merit.” Nawaya was not the only one targeted; One post insulted another woman politician from the National Unity Platform party, Joyce Bagala : “Meet Joyce Bagala, who chose susu over her party.” In this context, the primary meaning of the word “susu” in Luganda is “urine,” but it also suggests that she chose to sleep around and abandon her party. Another implied she was the mistress of the Democratic Front party leader , Mathias Mpuuga . It is Joyce’s right to back whoever she wants to back, and the violent attacks on her agency play into the patriarchal handbook that women are prostitutes because of the choices that they make. Yvonne Mpambara, who was an aspiring presidential candidate for the 2026 elections, also wrote about how she was harassed online: I faced online harassment where men constantly called me ‘the makeup president incapable of leading anyone’ … I was accused of being a Rwandan spy who was sleeping with (Rwandan) President Kagame and trying to destabilize the Ugandan government. AI-generated deepfakes and disinformation An AI-generated image on TikTok claimed that Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga , the former speaker of the Ugandan parliament, had been airlifted to Aga Khan Hospital in Nairobi. This was a completely fake story, but most commentators wished the former speaker a quick recovery, without noticing that the photos were doctored. The former speaker responded to the rumors: Stop spreading rumors am actually seated in my home, have not been anywhere near Agha Khan Hospital https://t.co/Y6m1QvwYAP — Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga (@RebeccaKadagaUG) December 19, 2025 The misogyny has been widespread across parties, even those that were seeking to dethrone the 40-year presidency of President Yoweri Museveni . AI-generated Deepfakes by opposition members about Anita Among , the current speaker of parliament, spreading “hate speech,” are circulating on TikTok. Additionally, National Unity Platform (NUP) supporters began attacking one of their own members who had defected to the breakaway party, the “Democratic Front.” YouTuber, Dean Lubowa Sava , reportedly said, “Joyce Bagala must give sex to NUP top boss who thinks she gave it to Matthias Mpuuga or else she should forget about NUP reconciliation.” Mpuuga is the founder of the Democratic Front. Technology is amplifying Gender Based Violence Violence against women has always existed in Uganda; technology has just amplified it. A UN Women report mentioned that 95 percent of Ugandan women had experienced physical and/or sexual violence , according to the Ugandan Bureau of Statistics. The findings revealed that 49 percent of citizens say violence against women and girls is a common occurrence in their community. Meanwhile, 62 percent see domestic violence as a private matter to be resolved within the family rather than a criminal matter requiring the involvement of law enforcement. A majority, 54 percent, say it is likely that a woman who reports gender-based violence (GBV) to the authorities will be criticized, harassed, or shamed by others in the community. There is no specific law that is specific to tech-facilitated gender-based violence. While the law that is supposed to protect women online is the Computer Misuse Act 2011, before it was amended , it has instead been used to attack feminist dissenters like Stella Nyanzi. Therefore, as Uganda grapples with its political future, it is clear that women in Uganda have a long way to go in breaking barriers that hinder political participation, and that tech-facilitated violence against women is another tactic that serves to silence women. Written by Prudence Nyamishana

AI Variants

news_brief

gpt-5.4

Online abuse and AI deepfakes target women in Uganda’s 2026 election season

Short summary: Women politicians in Uganda faced misogynistic harassment, AI-generated falsehoods and sexualized disinformation during the 2026 election period, highlighting how digital platforms are amplifying gender-based violence in politics.

Long summary: Uganda’s 2026 election season exposed the growing use of tech-facilitated violence against women in politics. Female candidates and political figures were targeted with misogynistic commentary, sexualized rumors, AI-generated images and deepfake-style disinformation across social media platforms. Cases cited include attacks on youth parliamentary aspirant Nawaya Gloria, false health rumors about former speaker Rebecca Kadaga, and repeated online abuse aimed at women across party lines. The trend reflects a broader environment in which violence against women is already widespread, while legal protections against technology-enabled gender-based abuse remain limited.

Women politicians in Uganda were subjected to coordinated online abuse during the country’s 2026 election period, with digital attacks ranging from misogynistic insults to AI-generated false content.

The harassment affected candidates and public figures across the political spectrum. Youth parliamentary aspirant Nawaya Gloria, who publicly shared her experience of living with HIV and her intention to run for office, was met with sexualized and dismissive comments online. Other women, including Joyce Bagala and Yvonne Mpambara, were also targeted with gendered insults and allegations meant to undermine their credibility and autonomy.

False and manipulated content also spread during the campaign season. An AI-generated image on TikTok falsely claimed that former parliamentary speaker Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga had been hospitalized in Nairobi. Deepfake-style content and online disinformation also circulated about other senior political figures, including speaker Anita Among.

The abuse unfolded in a country where women have long played major roles in political life and where affirmative action reserves seats for women in local government and parliament. Yet digital platforms are increasingly being used to reinforce patriarchal narratives and discourage women’s political participation.

The issue is compounded by weak protections against tech-facilitated gender-based violence. Uganda has no law specifically tailored to this form of abuse, and existing online regulation has drawn criticism for being used against dissenting voices rather than safeguarding women. The election period has underscored how online violence is becoming another barrier to women seeking public office.

Tags: Uganda, women in politics, 2026 elections, gender-based violence, deepfakes, disinformation, social media, Africa

Hashtags: #Uganda, #WomenInPolitics, #Election2026, #DigitalViolence, #Deepfakes

social

gpt-5.4

Uganda’s women politicians are fighting a digital campaign of abuse

Short summary: Uganda’s 2026 election season showed how online misogyny, AI-generated fakes and sexualized rumors are being used to push women out of politics.

Long summary: Female politicians and candidates in Uganda faced a surge of digital abuse during the 2026 election season. The attacks included misogynistic insults, sexualized smears, false accusations, AI-generated images and deepfake-style disinformation. Women from different political camps were targeted, including Nawaya Gloria, Joyce Bagala, Yvonne Mpambara, Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga and Anita Among. The pattern highlights how technology is amplifying existing gender-based violence in Uganda. Despite women’s longstanding contributions to politics and constitutional measures meant to support their participation, online platforms are being used to shame, intimidate and delegitimize them. With no specific law addressing tech-facilitated gender-based violence, the digital space is becoming an increasingly hostile arena for women seeking public office.

Uganda’s 2026 elections exposed a harsh reality for women in politics: campaigning now means battling not only opponents, but also deepfakes, doctored images, sexualized smears and organized online harassment.

Women across party lines were targeted. Nawaya Gloria faced misogynistic attacks after sharing her plan to run for youth parliament. Joyce Bagala was hit with sexually suggestive insults tied to her political choices. Yvonne Mpambara said she was mocked over her appearance and accused of being a foreign agent. A fake AI-generated image falsely claimed Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga had been hospitalized, while deepfake-style content also circulated about Anita Among.

The abuse points to a bigger issue. Technology is amplifying gender-based violence that already exists offline, while legal protections remain limited. The result is a digital environment that can silence, intimidate and discourage women from participating fully in public life.

Ugandan women have helped shape the country’s political history for decades. But the 2026 election season showed that equal participation still comes with a heavy online cost.

Tags: social media abuse, Uganda women leaders, digital rights, elections, misogyny, AI disinformation, gender justice, political violence

Hashtags: #Uganda, #WomenInPolitics, #OnlineHarassment, #Deepfakes, #Disinformation

web

gpt-5.4

Women candidates in Uganda confront deepfakes, disinformation and misogyny in 2026 elections

Short summary: From sexualized smears to AI-generated false images, women involved in Uganda’s 2026 elections faced escalating digital abuse that activists say is being used to silence female political participation.

Long summary: Women have long helped shape Uganda’s political landscape, aided in part by constitutional affirmative-action provisions that reserve seats for women in parliament and local government. But during the 2026 elections, female candidates and political figures encountered a wave of online abuse that included sexualized attacks, gendered disinformation, doctored imagery and deepfake-style content. Among those targeted was Nawaya Gloria, a human rights lawyer and aspiring youth member of parliament, who said her announcement that she intended to run was met with misogynistic ridicule, including comments implying young women seek office for sexual access rather than public service. Joyce Bagala was targeted with crude and sexually suggestive smears tied to her political choices, while former presidential aspirant Yvonne Mpambara said online attackers mocked her appearance and accused her of being a foreign agent. Disinformation also spread through AI-generated and manipulated media. A false TikTok post claimed former speaker Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga had been hospitalized in Nairobi, prompting public concern before she denied the report. Similar deepfake-style material circulated about speaker Anita Among. The attacks crossed party lines, showing how digital platforms are being weaponized against women broadly rather than confined to one political camp. The trend reflects deeper structural problems. Reports cited in the article show violence against women remains widespread in Uganda, while legal safeguards against tech-enabled abuse are limited. Critics say existing online laws have not adequately protected women and have at times been used against outspoken feminist voices. For many observers, the 2026 elections illustrated how technology is magnifying older forms of gender-based violence and raising the cost of women’s participation in public life.

Women in Uganda’s 2026 elections faced more than the usual demands of campaigning. For many, entering the political arena also meant confronting a flood of online abuse, manipulated content and gendered disinformation designed to humiliate, intimidate and discredit them.

Ugandan women have historically played an important role in national politics, from senior government positions to constitutional reform. The 1995 constitution introduced affirmative-action measures that reserve a share of parliamentary and local government seats for women, creating formal space for political participation. But that presence has not shielded women from violence; instead, digital tools are increasingly being used to update familiar forms of misogyny for the social media age.

Several cases during the 2026 election period illustrate the pattern. Nawaya Gloria, a human rights lawyer, HIV advocate and aspiring youth member of parliament for the central region, publicly announced her candidacy and said she hoped to become the first young person living with HIV to represent youth voices in parliament. Rather than receiving support, she was met by online commentary that framed her political ambition through sexual innuendo and stigma. She responded by insisting her candidacy was about public service and change, not the degrading narratives being imposed on her.

Other women politicians were similarly targeted. Joyce Bagala was attacked with insulting and sexually suggestive language tied to her political alignment, reinforcing a recurring trope that women’s decisions in public life are evidence of promiscuity rather than agency. Former presidential aspirant Yvonne Mpambara said men derided her as a “makeup president” and spread accusations that she was linked to Rwanda and involved in a plot to destabilize Uganda. The claims attacked both her competence and her legitimacy.

Artificial intelligence and manipulated imagery added a new layer to the abuse. A fake TikTok image claimed former parliamentary speaker Rebecca Alitwala Kadaga had been airlifted to a Nairobi hospital, prompting many social media users to wish her recovery before she publicly denied the report. Deepfake-style content also circulated about current speaker Anita Among. These incidents showed how quickly false narratives can spread when visual content appears credible enough to evade scrutiny.

The abuse has not been limited to one party or ideology. Women across government, opposition and breakaway movements have faced digital attacks, suggesting that misogyny remains a common language of political contestation even among rivals who disagree on almost everything else.

The broader context is troubling. Violence against women is already widespread in Uganda, and social attitudes often discourage reporting or treat abuse as a private matter. At the same time, there is no law specifically focused on tech-facilitated gender-based violence. Existing online legislation has been criticized for failing to protect women effectively and, in some cases, for being used against outspoken feminist figures instead.

Taken together, the 2026 election period revealed how social platforms, AI-generated media and disinformation tactics are raising the risks for women who seek office. For women in Ugandan politics, the digital sphere has become another frontline in the struggle for equal participation.

Tags: Uganda politics, 2026 Uganda elections, women candidates, online harassment, AI-generated images, deepfakes, gendered disinformation, political participation

Hashtags: #UgandaElections, #WomenInPolitics, #Deepfakes, #Disinformation, #GenderBasedViolence

Media

No media attached.

Audit Log

No audit events recorded.